Loading Form...
Thank you
Jul 24, 2008 | 5 minute read
written by Linda Bustos
Because the AdWords system rewards keywords with high click-through history (relative to competitors) with better ad positions and lower cost-per-click, click through rate is considered an important performance metric. Along with a keyword's relevance to ad text and landing page copy, click through rate influences a keyword's "Quality Score."
Every PPC campaign is bound to have a few (or few thousand) keywords with low click through rates. You can identify them easily enough with web analytics and campaign reports, but what do you do with them?
You have at least 6 options:
1. Do nothing. You're always going to have stinkers, why major on the minors?2. Try to improve your Quality Score, which should improve ad position, which may positively affect click through rates.3. Add negative keywords if you're using broad or phrase matching.4. Create a new Ad Group. Pull poor performers out of your current Ad Group and start over with better ad text and landing page.5. Create an AdGroup for branding purposes. You don't expect clicks, but using your company name in the headline is free exposure.6. Pause or delete them. Either way, you stop bidding.
But before you take action based on click through stats alone, it's important to dig deeper as to why the click through rate stinks.
If your average ad position is high (1-3), it's probably not a Quality Score issue. It's more likely one of the following:
If your average ad position is medium (4-10), you may have any of the above problems, plus:
If your average ad position is low (10+)
Can low CTR% be a good thing?
There may be instances you want to lower click through rates. For example, if you sell high end furniture, adding "From $2999" to your ad for "teak outdoor patio set" will weed out the shoppers looking for Ikea-grade, who are thinking frugal but not expressing it in their search query. Plus, you'll likely increase click through from luxury buyers. Your conversion rate, cost per conversion and ROI will improve. (It would make sense that Google factor conversion rates into Quality Score, since it is a better indicator of relevance than click through rate. Perhaps it's one of the "other relevance factors" Google keeps to itself.)
That's a bit trickier.
Low conversion rate
Why spend money on keywords that don't convert, right? The problem is, a keyword may have a 0% conversion rate but still be responsible for many sales. According to a 2005 comScore study, searchers who ultimately purchased online performed an average of 13 searches before converting, resulting in 12 non-converting searches for every sale. If the sales cycle exceeds your cookie expiration dates, some keywords may never get the conversion credit they're due. (Great article on non-converting keywords by Frederick Marckini at Clickz)
What's more, online searches can result in telephone orders, or even offline sales - which are even harder to reconcile, since there's no cookie that tracks those.
Negative ROI
Keywords with negative ROI should be investigated. Are bids too high? Can landing pages be improved? Is broad match burning your budget and could keyword research help? They can even be a blessing. Lessons you learn from attempting to salvage negative ROI keywords may even benefit your campaign as a whole if you can apply "better practices" across the board.
If margin on the products or overall sales are low, you may decide to kill the keyword based on negative ROI to allocate budget for clearly profitable keywords and products.
The takeaway is to never kill a keyword simply because of a low metric. Always investigate the possible reasons for the low metric.